I am intrigued to know if anything else came to mind after Mother Nature? - only a reminder of a friend's long-haired labrador and his first wife who was a blonde.
My answer to your question about masculine/mother nature IS “ruled” by whether TAO begot feminine or masculine as ONE and/or feminine or masculine as TWO - which in either case begot the relationship twix ONE & TWO as THREE which begot 10,000 THINGS.
The ZEN-like MIND-set “switch” which every last one of US has the inherent capability of “throwing” must be mastered in order that - the part of the old philisophical debate which asks whether we can infer the reality of mathematical concepts like “three” or “triangles” from our apparent ability to identify sets of threes or to group them in triangular fashion - might be “seen through” to TRULY understand.
You will note that my TURIYAconstructof 20 spheres into a “triangular pyramid” has 4 triangular sides - 10 balls per side.
IF we were able to remove ALL 4 sides (quadrants) of 10 balls per side for BOTH ONE & TWO - 80 balls in total - 1 ball would remain at the centre from a construct perspective - BUT NO THING IN REALITY.
So which 1 of your 81 IS “representative” of TAO ?
MOTHER NATURE
I am intrigued to know if anything else came to mind after Mother Nature? - only a reminder of a friend's long-haired labrador and his first wife who was a blonde.
My answer to your question about masculine/mother nature IS “ruled” by whether TAO begot feminine or masculine as ONE and/or feminine or masculine as TWO - which in either case begot the relationship twix ONE & TWO as THREE which begot 10,000 THINGS.
The ZEN-like MIND-set “switch” which every last one of US has the inherent capability of “throwing” must be mastered in order that - the part of the old philisophical debate which asks whether we can infer the reality of mathematical concepts like “three” or “triangles” from our apparent ability to identify sets of threes or to group them in triangular fashion - might be “seen through” to TRULY understand.
You will note that my TURIYA construct of 20 spheres into a “triangular pyramid” has 4 triangular sides - 10 balls per side.
IF we were able to remove ALL 4 sides (quadrants) of 10 balls per side for BOTH ONE & TWO - 80 balls in total - 1 ball would remain at the centre from a construct perspective - BUT NO THING IN REALITY.
So which 1 of your 81 IS “representative” of TAO ?